A California solar panel manufacturer that received a half-billion dollar loan from the federal government before declaring bankruptcy says it’s been unable to attract much interest from potential buyers to take over its operations.
Instead, Solyndra LLC is looking at a piecemeal sale of its assets, with separate auctions for its machinery and equipment, real estate and intellectual property.
Solyndra officials told a U.S. bankruptcy trustee Tuesday that no qualified bidders have come forward to buy the company and take over its manufacturing operations.
Chief restructuring officer Todd Neilson said Fremont, Calif.-based Solyndra had received only one bid for a sale of the whole company.
“It was extremely low-ball,” he explained. “It was mainly designed to take the equipment and the real estate at an extraordinarily low price.”
Neilson said fewer than five potential bidders, mostly from other countries, are still conducting due diligence. But it is “highly unlikely” that a buyer willing to buy Solyndra outright and continue its operations would emerge, he said.
Solyndra representatives blamed the lack of interest on the economy, not on the political fallout stemming from Solyndra’s failure.
“It’s a difficult economic environment. It’s a difficult industry,” Debra Grassgreen, a Solyndra bankruptcy attorney, said after a creditors meeting Tuesday.
Solyndra, which received a $528 million federal loan and was touted by the Obama administration as a “green jobs” creator, filed for bankruptcy protection in September. The filing came several months after a February loan restructuring in which some $70 million borrowed from private investors got priority over $385 million in taxpayer money for repayment in the event of a default.
Under the February restructuring, Argonaut Ventures and another private investment firm, Madrone Partners LP, stand to be repaid before U.S bad credit payday advance. taxpayers. Congressional leaders have said allowing private investors to move ahead of taxpayers for repayment may have been illegal.
Argonaut is an investment vehicle of the George Kaiser Family Foundation of Tulsa, Okla. The foundation is headed by Oklahoma billionaire George Kaiser, a major Obama campaign contributor and a frequent visitor to the White House.
Following its bankruptcy filing, Solyndra became the target of separate investigations by the FBI and congressional Republicans.
Testifying before a House committee last week, Energy Secretary Steven Chu defended the federal loan to Solyndra, but at that same time said he was unaware of many details about the loan or financial problems that Solyndra faced, including predictions by DOE staff two years ago that the company would likely face severe cash-flow problems.
Chu also denied that he was influenced by Kaiser, who invested $400 million in Solyndra. Kaiser has said he played no part in helping Solyndra win the 2009 loan, but emails released earlier this month show that he discussed Solyndra with the White House on at least one occasion. Kaiser also directed business associates on how to approach the White House and the Energy Department to help Solyndra deal with its financial problems.
Chu denied that anyone in the White House ever contacted him to make a political decision on the loan and said cheap imports from China, the collapse of the European market for solar panels, and other market changes led prices for Solyndra’s product to fall.
While prospects for a takeover of Solyndra’s operations appear dim, officials said an auction of the company’s non-core assets, such as office equipment, went better than expected.
Trouble on two fronts in the European debt crisis sent American stocks tumbling Wednesday to their biggest loss since the rocky trading of last summer. The Dow Jones industrial average fell almost 400 points.
Stocks were down from the opening bell after borrowing costs in Italy spiked to dangerous levels, a sign that investors are losing faith in Italy’s ability to repay its national debt.
“Italy is potentially too big to bail out, but that’s the problem,” said Ryan Detrick, senior technical strategist at Schaeffer’s Investment Research. “It’s spiraling out, and the question is now, how do you fix it?”
In Greece, meanwhile, power-sharing talks aimed at avoiding a default broke down in chaos.
The Italian economy is more than six times larger than that of Greece, which so far has been the center of the continent’s debt problem. American investors are worried that the consequences from Europe could include a freeze in lending, the disintegration of the euro currency or a bruising recession that would hurt the U.S.
They sold stocks as a result. The Dow finished down 389.24 points, at 11,780.94.
“The market loves a quick solution, and we’re obviously not getting one,” said Mark Lehmann, director of equities of JMP Securities.
The slide in stocks was broad: Only a single stock in the Standard & Poor’s 500, Best Buy, finished higher for the day. Financial companies were among the hardest hit because they would suffer first if Europe’s debt problem spins out of control.
Morgan Stanley stock plunged 8 percent and Goldman Sachs 7 percent. In regulatory filings last week, Morgan Stanley reported it had $1.8 billion in liabilities related to Italy, and Goldman said it had $28 billion related to all of Europe.
Markets fear that a chaotic default by Greece would lead to huge losses for European banks. That could cause a global lending freeze similar to what happened after the investment house Lehman Brothers fell in 2008.
In Italy, where the crisis is only beginning, the country’s borrowing rate has skyrocketed to a level that is widely considered to be unsustainable. The higher rates will make it far more difficult and expensive for Italy to roll over its debts. It has over $400 billion to raise in 2012 alone. Italy’s total economy is about $2 trillion.
The 389-point decline for the Dow was the worst since Sept. 22. The S&P 500 closed down 46.82 points at 1,229.10. The S&P, the broadest major stock index, declined 3.7 percent, its worst day since Aug. 18.
Over the summer, swings of 3 or 4 percent a day for the stock market were common. Investors were focused on a debt showdown in Washington and fear of a second recession.
Lately, Europe has pushed everything else to the back burner, and the volatility has continued. Last week, the Dow fell 276 points Monday and 297 points Tuesday, both because of instability in Europe. It rose 100 or more three of the next five days.
The Nasdaq composite index finished Wednesday down 105.84, or 3.9 percent, at 2,621.65.
European stock markets fell sharply, too. The main stock index in Italy finished the day down 3.8 percent. The DAX index in Germany and the CAC-40 in France each declined 2.2 percent.
In the United States, prices rose for assets seen by investors as reasonably safe. The dollar rose 1.6 percent against the euro, a reflection of the instability in the 17 nations that use the euro.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note fell to 1.96 percent from 2.08 percent Tuesday, a steep drop. Falling Treasury yields are a sign of rising bond prices, both indications that investors feel safe buying American debt.
In Italy, the yield on the benchmark government bond blew past 7 percent. That was considered an important level because Greece, Portugal and Ireland required bailouts from other nations when their bond yields hit 7 percent.
Italy is of more concern because it has the third-largest economy in Europe _ more than twice as big as Greece, Portugal and Ireland combined. And its debt, $2.6 trillion, is too large for other European countries to erase.
Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi promised late Tuesday to step aside after a new budget is passed, but there are concerns that the transition will be difficult. Markets see Berlusconi as an impediment to far-reaching economic reforms.
The benchmark Italian bond rate spiked to 7.4 percent, a startling increase of 0.82 percent point from the day before. It settled down later in the day, to 7.26 percent.
In Greece, Prime Minister George Papandreou told the nation that the political parties were joining together to save it from going broke. Then power-sharing talks broke down, and political leaders failed to name a new prime minister.
Papandreou threw world markets into turmoil last week when he stunned European leaders by announcing he would put a hard-fought bailout deal for Greece up for a popular vote. He later backed off that plan and announced he would step aside.
When an interim government takes over for him, its main job will be to secure the next $11 billion or so of the $150 billion bailout package set up for Greece last year.
Starbucks hopes customers will be willing to pay at least $5 more when they stop in for their morning cup of Joe.
Starting Nov. 1, Starbucks will begin collecting donations of $5 or more from customers to stimulate U.S. job growth through its “Jobs for USA” program. The Seattle-based coffee chain is collaborating with the Opportunity Finance Network, a nonprofit that works with nearly 200 community development financial institutions to provide loans to small businesses and community groups. Starbucks says 100 percent of the donations will go toward loans for firms and organizations that can add jobs or stem job losses.
Starbucks, which pioneered how Americans drink coffee, declined to estimate how much money it plans to raise, but millions of people visit its nearly 7,000 company-owned U.S. stores each day. Customers who give will get a red, white and blue wristband that says “Indivisible.”
“This is about using Starbuck’s scale for good,” said Howard Schultz, Starbucks Corp.’s CEO.
The program is the latest effort by Schultz to address the nation’s economic woes. In August, he sent more than 200,000 Starbucks employees a memo urging them to do what they can to help business thrive. Then, he asked fellow CEOs to stop contributing to political campaigns until the nation’s leaders reached a long-term economic solution. After that, he hosted a national telephone forum, bought full-page ads in two major newspapers and started a website, Upwardspiral2011.org.
Schultz said he feels personal responsibility to do something to stimulate the U.S. economy. Starbucks is hiring about 200 people a day in the U.S. as part of its efforts to remodel thousands of stores and add about 200 more locations in the next year. But Schultz said he wanted to do more.
Starbucks is covering the operational costs to get loans out through the program, which will run indefinitely. Its charitable arm, The Starbucks Foundation, is giving $5 million to get the program started, with the hope that funds will be invested in communities within a month of a donation being made business card design.
Opportunity Finance Network works with 180 financial institutions _ banks, credit, unions, loan funds and venture capital funds _ that give loans in low-income communities that don’t have easy access to credit. The organization, created 27 years ago, has invested $23.2 billion and generated nearly 300,000 jobs through 2009.
Loans through the network have supported everything from charter schools to grocery stores nationwide. The organization found that, even during the recession, more than 98 percent of the money loaned out has been repaid, which is in line with traditional lenders.
Through the program, businesses will apply to financial institutions, which along with the Opportunity Finance Network will assess their potential for adding jobs. Preference will be given to applicants who can add jobs within six months. An outside organization will audit the program within a year.
“We want to match up every person who has $5 to share with every person who can’t spare $5,” said Mark Pinsky, CEO of Opportunity Finance Network.
The effort has the potential to be successful, say some experts. Community institutions succeed, they say, because they understand the needs in the areas they serve.
“I think it’s a really worthy effort,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. “In theory, this is a great idea and should have impact.”
____
Online: For more information, visit createjobsforusa.org or for information on Opportunity Finance Network and how to find a community development funding institution, visit opportunityfinance.net
.
German officials on Monday downplayed prospects of any quick and dramatic change of course in the eurozone debt crisis, days before a parliamentary vote on beefing up the continent’s rescue fund.
Weekend meetings of global financial leaders in Washington raised hopes of a change in strategy, with officials indicating that would focus on further boosting the firepower of the euro440 billion ($595 billion) rescue fund _ perhaps by allowing it to tap loans from the European Central Bank or otherwise leveraging its lending capacity.
Hopes for such a move boosted European stock markets on Monday, with German and French bank shares rising strongly.
However, ahead of a parliamentary vote Thursday on changes to the fund that eurozone leaders already agreed to in July, Berlin was keen to underline its attachment to its often-criticized step-by-step approach.
Thursday’s vote on expanding the powers of the rescue fund, the so-called European Financial Stability Facility, will be followed over the coming months by final decisions on a second bailout package for Greece and on a permanent rescue mechanism meant to succeed the EFSF from 2013, Finance Ministry spokesman Martin Kotthaus noted.
“That is quite simply the procedure that lies in front of us _ we will work through it step by step,” Kotthaus said.
When asked in Washington whether he supported the idea of leveraging the rescue fund, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said: “Of course we will use the EFSF in the most efficient way possible.”
His spokesman, Kotthaus, said that the EFSF “is how it is” and noted that only a small part of the funding has already been committed.
Asked about the possibility of leveraging the fund, he said “the discussion is not so far along that I could contribute any examples, ideas or subideas.”
Some in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s center-right coalition already find beefing up the EFSF by giving it new powers hard to swallow, and anything beyond that could be a hard sell among its lawmakers.
Christian Lindner, the general secretary of the Free Democrats _ Merkel’s junior coalition partner _ called on the chancellor to provide clarity and stressed that his party opposes allowing the fund to tap ECB loans quick guaranteed personal loans.
A prominent opposition lawmaker, center-left Social Democrat Carsten Schneider, said the government should come clean on its “real intentions.”
“In Washington and Brussels they are already planning new programs in the billions, and in Germany the parliament and public are having the wool pulled over their eyes,” Schneider was quoted as telling Der Spiegel magazine.
Merkel’s spokesman rejected that accusation sharply.
“The true intentions of the government and the chancellor are on the table,” Steffen Seibert said. “They will be decided on in parliament Thursday.”
Merkel has been caught between criticism from abroad for doing too little and from supporters at home who fear she is spending too much taxpayer money on the crisis. She went on German television Sunday night to defend her step-by-step tackling of the crisis.
She warned of the dangers a radical restructuring of Greek debt might bring at this stage.
“Lehman Brothers was allowed to go bust, and then the world was surprised that it fell into a deep crisis,” Merkel said on ARD television.
“What we have to learn is that we can only take steps we can really control,” she added. “The word ‘haircut’ is easy to say on its own … (but) we must go step by step.”
In financial terms, a haircut is a loss investors take on an asset. Many experts believe Greece’s bondholders will have to take a sharp haircut _ that is, not get paid back fully for the money they lent to the country _ if Greece is to have any chance of reducing its debt load.
“What we cannot do is, along the way, destroy the confidence of all investors, and (have) them say, OK, they did this with Greece now; tomorrow they’ll do it with Spain, the day after with Belgium or some other country,” Merkel said.
“Then no one anywhere would invest their money in Europe any more, and we have to prevent that.”
After eight months of contract-wrangling and negotiations that dragged past a strike deadline, supermarket workers in Southern California will stay on the job and shoppers won’t have to rely on Whole Foods or their corner liquor store for groceries.
Members of the region’s United Food and Commercial Workers voted to ratify a new contract with three major grocery chains, union local spokeswoman Ellen Anreder said, averting a strike of more than 60,000 workers that could have crippled the industry and left shoppers scrambling.
United Food and Commercial Workers local spokeswoman Ellen Anreder said Saturday that after two days of voting, members agreed to a deal struck Monday with Vons, Ralphs and Albertsons. Exact vote totals were not released.
“We’re all very grateful to our customers for their support over this eight-month process, and are very grateful that we can continue to serve them,” a tired-but-relieved Anreder said after the vote.
Union officials had urged their rank-and-file to ratify the contract, which they said addressed concerns about funding for the employees’ health plan, the main sticking point during months of negotiations.
“This package protects our members’ access to affordable comprehensive health care for themselves and their families,” the union said in a statement. “That was our top priority throughout the negotiating process.”
The supermarkets, meanwhile, said after agreeing to the deal that it would allow them to remain competitive. Messages left for grocery representatives after the vote were not immediately returned.
Details of the agreement were made available to members for the first time as they filed into their union locals’ headquarters or other voting locations to cast their ballots on Friday and Saturday.
“There was a sense of relief when people had an opportunity to really look over the new contract and see what was in it,” Ralphs clerk and union member Mario Frias said.
The deal ended months of sometimes testy discussions between union officials and representatives of The Vons Cos.; Ralphs Grocery Co., a subsidiary of The Kroger Co.; and Albertsons, which is owned by Supervalu Inc.
Ralphs had indicated it would initially close all 250 of its stores if there had been a strike; Albertsons had said it could shutter up to 100 locations, while Vons had said its stores would remain open.
The prospect of shuttered stores and tense picket lines brought fears of a repeat of the four-month strike in 2004 that cost the industry $2 billion and created a mess for shoppers. This time around, with unemployment at 12.1 percent in California, workers evidently feared that they would find little public sympathy if they voluntarily walked off the job.
The market chains, meanwhile, were likely reluctant to invite shutdowns and picket lines that might alienate shoppers already spending less due to the economic downturn.
Union leaders and the markets announced in July that they had reached a tentative agreement on the employers’ contributions to pension benefits, but remained far apart on payments to the union health care trust fund.
Union members voted overwhelmingly last month to authorize their leaders to call a strike. Those leaders said they were responding to what they characterized as the chains’ delaying tactics when they issued the required 72-hour notice Thursday evening to cancel the contract extension under which they had been working since March.
But after the Sunday evening deadline passed with neither a strike nor a deal, store employees returned to work. Union officials announced Monday that the tentative deal had been reached.
Asian stocks headed lower Thursday, stung by a pessimistic assessment of the U.S. economy by the Federal Reserve.
Japan’s Nikkei 225 slumped 1.6 percent to 8,598.32 while South Korea’s Kospi index slid 2.6 percent to 1,806.62. Benchmarks in New Zealand, Singapore and Taiwan were also lower.
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index plummeted 3.6 percent to 18,138.32, with blue chip property developers among the biggest losers. China Resources Land Ltd. tumbled 10.1 percent while China Overseas Land & Investment slid 7.9 percent. China Vanke Co. lost 3.8 percent.
Australia’s S&P ASX 200 was 2.2 percent down at 3,984.40, with energy shares plummeting amid fears of a global economic slowdown. BHP Billiton, the world’s largest mining company, lost 3.3 percent. Rival Rio Tinto Ltd. plunged 5 percent. OZ Minerals dropped 6.3 percent.
Falling gold prices hit precious metal stocks. Hong Kong-listed Zijin Mining Group, China’s No. 1 gold miner, lost 4.9 percent. Newcrest Mining, Australia’s biggest gold miner, fell 2.2 percent.
Ben Potter of IG Markets in Melbourne, Australia said in a report that he expects “a session of heavy selling as the world reacts to the Fed’s downbeat outlook for the US economy.”
In a highly anticipated move, the Fed on Wednesday announced it would buy Treasury bonds to help the U.S. economy. But Wall Street stocks fell anyway because the U.S. central bank made it clear that a full U.S. economic recovery was likely years away.
The Dow Jones industrial average lost 2.5 percent to close at 11,124.84. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell 2.9 percent to 1,166.76. The Nasdaq composite fell 2 percent to 2,538.19.
The Fed said after a two-day meeting that it would buy long-term Treasurys and sell short-term ones to help the economy regain momentum. It surprised investors when it said it would include more 30-year bonds in its purchases than expected.
The Fed said it would buy $400 billion in 6-year to 30-year Treasurys by June 2012. Over the same period, it planned to sell $400 billion of Treasurys maturing in 3 years or less. The move is intended to drive down interest rates on long-term government debt, and could lower rates on mortgages and other loans.
The inclusion of more 30-year bonds than expected means the Fed saw the need to keep very long-term rates lower for an extended period. Many analysts viewed the move as an acknowledgment that the U.S. economy’s problems are long-term.
The Fed also bleakly stated that the economy has “significant downside risks” and that a number of problems won’t be easily solved, including high unemployment and a depressed housing market.
Meanwhile, the price of oil continued its slide on expectations that there’ll be less demand for energy because of the U.S. economy.
Benchmark crude for October delivery was down 99 cents per barrel to $84.92 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell $1.00 to settle at $85.92 on the Nymex on Wednesday.
In currency trading, the dollar rose to 76.76 yen from 76.56 yen late Wednesday in New York. The euro fell to $1.3564 from $1.3667.
The crash of an aging Russian jet last week that killed 44 people, including an entire professional hockey team, was among a string of recent deadly crashes in Russia that have scared the public and prompted the president to suggest replacing all Soviet-era aircraft with Western-made planes.
But industry experts say that the air disasters plaguing Russia are rooted not simply in the planes’ age, but in a myriad of other problems, including poor crew training, crumbling airports, lax government controls and widespread neglect of safety in the pursuit of profits.
“It’s like an ax hanging over the head of each of us,” said Oleg Smirnov, a highly decorated pilot who served as deputy civil aviation minister during Soviet times.
He and other experts warn there is no quick remedy for the industry’s woes _ exacerbated by government inefficiency and corruption. They blame state regulators for turning a blind eye to aviation problems and failing to establish proper control over flight safety.
Veteran pilots insist aircraft like the Yak-42 that crashed last week, the Tu-134 that went down in June _ killing 47 people _ and the An-24 that crash-landed on the Ob River in July and killed seven, are solid designs that are safe to fly despite their age if they are operated properly.
An official panel conducting the probe into the Yak-42 crash hasn’t yet named the cause, but has said it has found no evidence of equipment failure. However, two other such jets belonging to the owner of the crashed plane were grounded after a safety watchdog found that some engine components had exceeded their service time.
While most pilots and industry experts describe the Soviet-era planes as outdated but rugged and reliable, some say that the airlines have struggled to keep them airworthy.
“The collapse of aircraft components production has created a major problem,” Alexander Akimenkov, a veteran test pilot who has flown 80 types of Russian and Western planes, told The Associated Press.
Akimenkov said the owners of Soviet-made planes have had to rummage around the country for spare parts to keep them flying. The shortage of spare parts has spawned the use of plane components from old depots, which sometimes lack proper service certificates, as well as recycled components.
The government has done little to strengthen air safety. Russia has four government agencies overseeing aviation, but their functions are vaguely defined and often duplicate one another.
“There is an immediate need for a single government agency in charge of aviation,” said veteran pilot Vladimir Gerasimov, who blamed authorities for failing to make safety the top priority. He argued that loose regulations contributed to some of the recent crashes by permitting pilots to perform risky landing maneuvers.
Gerasimov said that greed prevails over safety at some Russian carriers, whose management encourages crews to save fuel no matter what. That often prompts pilots to make risky decisions like landing in bad weather instead of flying to another airport out of fear of losing their pay.
“Pilots act under pressure of possible sanctions for making the right decisions,” Gerasimov told The Associated Press.
Russia’s President Dmitry Medvedev responded to the latest crash by ordering officials to shut most of the nation’s 130 carriers, saying small airlines tend to cut corners on safety. He also said the government may end attempts to bail out struggling national aircraft makers and buy more foreign planes. “The value of human life must prevail over all other considerations, such as support for local producers,” Medvedev said.
Many industry insiders warn, however, that replacing the old planes won’t solve the industry’s problems because Western aircraft require the modern infrastructure that Russia lacks.
“The president suggests using Western planes, but in that case we would also need to have Western infrastructure,” said Akimenkov, the veteran test pilot.
Akimenkov, who tested the performance of several Soviet-designed planes in extreme conditions, said that Western planes generally require more careful maintenance and aren’t always fit for use at primitive airports and in the rugged conditions of Russia’s Far North.
The nation’s airports have remained in state hands, and most of them continue to rely on outdated navigation and communications equipment and are in dire need of repairs.
While June’s Tu-134 crash in the northwestern city of Petrozavodsk has been blamed on the pilot, who might have mistaken a nearby highway for the runway while trying to land in deep fog, experts said the antiquated condition of the local airport contributed to the disaster.
Only three airports in the country are equipped with state-of-the art automatic landing systems, while all others continue to rely on old navigation equipment, which puts more pressure on the crews when they land at night or in bad weather, raising the likelihood of pilot error.
Poland said that insufficient lighting at an airport in Smolensk in western Russia was among the factors that contributed to the April 2010 crash of a Soviet-made Tu-154 that killed Polish President Lech Kaczynski and 95 other people.
The largest airlines, including the national flag carrier Aeroflot, already have withdrawn Soviet-era planes from service and rely almost entirely on Boeings and Airbuses, which burn less fuel and meet European requirements for noise and emissions. Imported planes accounted for 83 percent of passengers carried by Russian airlines last year, and the figure will likely reach 90 percent this year, Smirnov said.
But Boeings and Airbuses are used only on the busiest foreign and domestic flights, while hundreds of other routes across Russia’s nine time zones are served by small regional carriers, most of which have only a handful of aging Soviet-era aircraft and simply can’t afford Western planes.
Alexei Sinitsky, the editor of Air Transport Review monthly magazine, said that bigger carriers have shown no interest in serving smaller airports, which would require a big investment and wouldn’t bring sizable returns. He argued that many smaller carriers have a good safety record and warned that Medvedev’s orders would have “monstrous consequences for both Russia’s aviation and for the population of remote regions.”
Other experts also said that an attempt to quickly discard old aircraft and radically cut the number of carriers would paralyze air traffic across most of Russia.
“Aviation is what keeps our country together,” said Smirnov, warning that air transport provides the only link to many areas of Siberia and the Far East. “Closing an airport means closing a city.”
British police say a sixth man has been charged with murder in the deaths of three men in a hit-and-run attack during riots in the English city of Birmingham.
West Midlands Police said Wednesday the 29-year-old man will appear at Birmingham Magistrates court on Thursday in connection with the murders of 20-year-old Haroon Jahan and brothers Shazad Ali, 30, and Abdul Musavir, 31.
The trio were killed after a car, allegedly containing several looters, struck them at high speed as they stood guard in front of a row of Pakistani-owned shops paydayloans.
Five other men ranging in age from 17 to 30 have already been charged with murder. All remain in custody.
WASHINGTON
The top Democrat in the House reacted positively to a new bipartisan budget plan emerging in the Senate, even as a top House GOP military hawk said it would cut defense way too much.
Asked about the budget unveiled Tuesday by the Senate’s “Gang of Six” at a brief appearance with reporters Wednesday morning, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, “It has some good principles in it.”
The group’s budget, which would slash the deficit by almost $4 trillion over a decade through a mix of spending cuts and new tax revenues, has also earned praise from President Barack Obama and many senators.
But House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., blasted the Gang of Six plan in a missive to his panel members, saying it would cut the Pentagon way too deeply and would unfairly curb military health and retirement benefits.
“This proposal raises serious implications for defense and would not allow us to perform our constitutional responsibility to provide for the safety and security of our country,” McKeon wrote in a memo to panel Republicans.
The mixed reviews came as an impasse in Washington over how to raise the nation’s borrowing cap to avoid a default on U.S. obligations dragged on with less than two weeks to an Aug. 2 deadline.
On Tuesday, the House doubled down on a symbolic vote to condition any increase in the government’s borrowing authority on congressional passage of a balanced budget constitutional amendment and a fresh wave of spending cuts. In the Senate, however, many Republicans warmed to a new bipartisan budget plan revealed a thawing in GOP attitudes on new tax revenues.
The plan by the Gang of Six is far too complicated and contentious to advance before an Aug. 2 deadline to avoid a default that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other experts warn would shake the markets, drive up interest rates and threaten to take the country back into a recession. But the plan’s authors clearly hope it could serve as a template for a “grand bargain” later in the year that could erase perhaps $4 trillion from the deficit over the coming decade.
Speaking on the Senate floor Wednesday morning, Democratic leader Harry Reid said he was confident Obama and congressional negotiators could avoid a government default, but the Senate still needed to hear from the House.
“We have a plan to go forward over here so I await word from the Speaker,” said the Nevada lawmaker, who also mentioned that he spoke to Obama Tuesday night. Reid was referring to a plan he’s working on with GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky to give Obama new powers to obtain an increase in the borrowing cap unless overridden by Congress.
In the House, the 234-190 vote Tuesday to pass the House GOP “cut, cap and balance” plan reflected the strength of tea party forces elected in last year’s midterm election. GOP conservatives reveled in their victory, however temporary it may be, since the plan faces a White House veto threat and is a dead letter in the Senate anyway.
“Let me be clear. This is the compromise. This is the best plan out there,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, head of a conservative House group known as the Republican Study Committee.
The GOP measure would impose an estimated $111 billion in immediate spending cuts next year and would cap overall spending at levels called for in the House’s April budget plan, backed up by the threat of automatic spending cuts. But what conservatives like most about it is its requirement that Congress approve a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution _ a step that requires a two-thirds vote in both House and Senate _ before any increase in the current $14.3 trillion debt limit can be shipped to Obama.
The balanced budget amendment requires limiting the size of government to 18 percent of the size of the economy, sparking a furious assault from Democrats who say it would force Medicare cuts much deeper than the controversial House GOP budget plan that passed in April _ which cut spending to 20 percent of the gross domestic product.
“The most elementary budget arithmetic dictates that you cannot limit the federal budget to 18 percent of GDP and continue to sustain Medicare,” said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.
Now that the House has blown off steam, Obama said Tuesday that he wants to “start talking turkey” with top congressional leaders like House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. A White House meeting had yet to be scheduled, though Obama seemed to hint one could take place Wednesday.
Reid has lined up behind a controversial McConnell plan to allow Obama to order up as much as $2.5 trillion in new debt without approval by Congress, which could only block the administration from issuing new debt if Congress disapproves by a veto-proof two-thirds margin in both House and Senate.
In exchange, Reid wants to attach to the McConnell plan a requirement for a bipartisan panel of 12 lawmakers to negotiate on a compromise that could come up for a vote later this year.
The Gang of Six plan promises almost $4 trillion in deficit cuts, including an immediate 10-year, $500 billion down payment that would come as Congress sets caps on the agency budgets it passes each year. It also requires an additional $500 billion in cost curbs on federal health care programs, cuts to federal employee pensions, curbs in the growth of military health care and retirement costs, and modest cuts to farm subsidies.
It also requires a major influx of new tax revenues as Congress overhauls the loophole-choked U.S. tax code. It calls for getting rid of myriad tax loopholes, preferences and deductions and using the savings to sharply lower income tax rates. But $1 trillion to $2 trillion would be skimmed off the top and used to reduce the deficit, depending on who does the calculations.
House GOP leaders were muted in their criticism and pointed to promised reductions in income tax rates rather than the net increase in overall tax collections.
“On the positive side, the tax rates identified in the Gang’s plan _ with a top rate of no more than 29 percent _ and the president’s endorsement of them are a positive development and an improvement over previous discussions,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said. “That said, I am concerned with the Gang of Six’s revenue target.”
The tax reform outline would set up three income tax rates _ a bottom rate of 8-12 percent, a middle rate of 14-22 percent and top rate of 23-29 percent _ to replace the current system, which has a bottom rate of 10 percent with five additional rates, topping out at 35 percent. It would reduce but not eliminate tax breaks on mortgage interest, higher-cost health plans, charitable deductions, retirement savings and families with children.
Powered by WordPress -- XHTML 1.0